Dell Tower ECT1250 Black 2025

Dell Tower ECT1250 Black 2025

Dell
94 综合评分
vs
MSI Cubi N CubNADL021 Black 2023

MSI Cubi N CubNADL021 Black 2023

MSI
33 综合评分

评分

Home Office
Dell
92
MSI
29
Business
Dell
89
MSI
31
Developer
Dell
84
MSI
18
Workstation
Dell
70
MSI
16
Compact
Dell
38
MSI
35
Ai Llm
Dell
33
MSI
9
Creator
Dell
30
MSI
9
Gaming
Dell
15
MSI
5

规格

Dell Tower ECT1250MSI Cubi N CubNADL021
Processor
CPU*Intel Core Ultra 7 265★64 bit Quad-Core Processor
CPU Multi-Core Score
49,732
5,319
Cores20★4
Frequency2.4 GHz★0.8 GHz
L3 Cache30 MB★6 MB
Graphics
GPUIntel UHD GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics
GPU Benchmark Score
1,534
1,534
Typeintegratedintegrated
VRAM TypeSharedShared
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB★4 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5★DDR4
Storage 12 TB★128 GB
Storage 1 TypeSSDSSD
Build
Form Factormid-towermini
PSU180W★65W
Weight6.41 kg0.66 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports11
USB Ports8★4
HDMI1x HDMI 2.11 x HDMI 1.4
DisplayPort1x DisplayPort 1.41x DisplayPort 1.4
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6★Wi-Fi 5
BluetoothBluetoothBluetooth 5.0★
EthernetGigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Pro

优缺点

Dell Tower ECT1250 Black 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong cpu (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong port selection (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average gpu (34th percentile)

MSI Cubi N CubNADL021 Black 2023

  • Below average ram (1st percentile)1st %ile
  • Below average cpu (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average storage (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average social proof (28th percentile)

价格

MSI Cubi N CubNADL021 Black 2023 is US$990 cheaper (4.0x less).

Dell Tower ECT1250 Black 20250.071每美元得分
vs
MSI Cubi N CubNADL021 Black 20230.101每美元得分

MSI Cubi N CubNADL021 Black 2023 性价比高 1.4 倍

Dell Tower ECT1250 Black 2025

MSI Cubi N CubNADL021 Black 2023

结论

★ 胜出: Dell Tower ECT1250

Scores 94 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 11 of 24 specs.

Dell Tower ECT1250 更擅长:

Ai LlmGamingCompactCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

也值得考虑