HP OmniDesk M02-0234 Gray Wood 2025

HP OmniDesk M02-0234 Gray Wood 2025

HP
91 综合评分
vs
Dell Tower ECT1250 Black 2025

Dell Tower ECT1250 Black 2025

Dell
93 综合评分

评分

Home Office
HP
86
Dell
92
Business
HP
84
Dell
89
Developer
HP
75
Dell
84
Compact
HP
73
Dell
38
Workstation
HP
64
Dell
69
Ai Llm
HP
30
Dell
33
Creator
HP
30
Dell
30
Gaming
HP
16
Dell
15

规格

HP OmniDesk M02-0234Dell Tower ECT1250
Processor
CPU*AMD Ryzen 7 8700GIntel Core Ultra 7 265
CPU Multi-Core Score
31,532
49,732
Cores820
Frequency4.2 GHz2.4 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB30 MB
Graphics
GPU*AMD Radeon 780MIntel UHD Graphics
GPU Benchmark Score
5,939
1,534
Typeintegratedintegrated
VRAM TypeSharedShared
Memory & Storage
RAM16 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 11 TB2 TB
Storage 1 TypeSSDSSD
Storage 2512 GB
Storage 2 TypeSSD
Build
Form Factormini-towermid-tower
PSU280W180W
Weight5.77 kg6.41 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports21
USB Ports88
HDMI1x HDMI1x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort1x DisplayPort 1.41x DisplayPort 1.4
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.4Bluetooth
EthernetGigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

优缺点

HP OmniDesk M02-0234 Gray Wood 2025

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong storage (81st percentile)81st %ile

Dell Tower ECT1250 Black 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong cpu (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong port selection (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average gpu (31st percentile)

价格

HP OmniDesk M02-0234 Gray Wood 2025 is US$520 cheaper (1.7x less).

HP OmniDesk M02-0234 Gray Wood 20250.114每美元得分
vs
Dell Tower ECT1250 Black 20250.071每美元得分

HP OmniDesk M02-0234 Gray Wood 2025 性价比高 1.6 倍

结论

平局

Both products are closely matched - HP OmniDesk M02-0234 wins 8 specs while Dell Tower ECT1250 wins 6.

HP OmniDesk M02-0234 更擅长:

Compact

Dell Tower ECT1250 更擅长:

Ai LlmBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

也值得考虑