Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 12-core LGA2011
Intel
51 综合评分
vs
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4
G.Skill
66 综合评分
买家怎么说
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 12-core LGA2011
75 满分 100 置信度中 12 条评价
这款十年前的服务器CPU在旧的台式工作站和服务器中表现出色，尤其是在2013年Mac Pro和Dell Precision T3610上。用户反映性能提升显著，风扇噪音降低。但也有少量用户遇到了兼容性问题或收到有缺陷的产品，还有人指出包装不当、针脚上有导热膏。
优点
- 可直接替换旧工作站
- 性能显著提升
- 降低风扇噪音和CPU温度
- 清洁且包装完好
- 性价比高
缺点
- 与某些服务器存在兼容性问题
- 收到有缺陷或无法使用的产品
- 针脚上有导热膏且包装不良
- 二手产品无保修
Compatibility 3
Performance improvement 4
Reliability 3
Packaging 2
Value for money 3
Cooling noise 2
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4
暂无用户反馈
评分
Efficiency
Productivity
Budget
Gaming
Server
Ai Llm
规格
| Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 | G.Skill Trident Z Neo | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | AMD |
| Series | Xeon | Ryzen 5 |
| Model | E5-2697V2 | 3600 |
| Codename | — | Matisse |
| Class | server | desktop |
| Process | — | 7★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 12★ | 6 |
| P-cores | — | 6★ |
| Threads | 24★ | 12 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 3 | 3 |
| L3 Cache | 30 | 32★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR3 | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | 无数据 | |
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| Max Memory | ||
| ECC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | FCLGA2011 | AMD Socket AM4 |
| PCIe | — | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16★ |
| TDP | 130 | 65★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✓★ |
优缺点
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 12-core LGA2011
- Strong multi thread (69th percentile)
- Strong social proof (69th percentile)
- Strong ai (69th percentile)
- Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4
- Strong feature (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong efficiency (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong platform (78th percentile)
- Strong multi thread (74th percentile)
价格
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 12-core LGA20110.262每美元得分
vs
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM40.175每美元得分
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 12-core LGA2011 性价比高 1.5 倍
结论
胜出: G.Skill Trident Z Neo
Scores 66 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 25 specs.
