MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5
MSI
16 综合评分
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 12-core LGA2011
Intel
51 综合评分
买家怎么说
MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5
暂无用户反馈
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 12-core LGA2011
75 满分 100 置信度中 12 条评价
这款十年前的服务器CPU在旧的台式工作站和服务器中表现出色，尤其是在2013年Mac Pro和Dell Precision T3610上。用户反映性能提升显著，风扇噪音降低。但也有少量用户遇到了兼容性问题或收到有缺陷的产品，还有人指出包装不当、针脚上有导热膏。
优点
- 可直接替换旧工作站
- 性能显著提升
- 降低风扇噪音和CPU温度
- 清洁且包装完好
- 性价比高
缺点
- 与某些服务器存在兼容性问题
- 收到有缺陷或无法使用的产品
- 针脚上有导热膏且包装不良
- 二手产品无保修
Compatibility 3
Performance improvement 4
Reliability 3
Packaging 2
Value for money 3
Cooling noise 2
评分
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Budget
Efficiency
Gaming
规格
| MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi | Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | Intel |
| Series | Ryzen 9 | Xeon |
| Model | 9000 | E5-2697V2 |
| Class | desktop | server |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 12★ |
| Threads | — | 24★ |
| Base Clock | 无数据 | |
| Boost Clock | 无数据 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 3★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 30★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | 无数据 | |
| PassMark Single | 无数据 | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR5★ | DDR3 |
| Max Speed | 无数据 | |
| Channels | 2★ | — |
| Max Memory | ||
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM5 | FCLGA2011 |
| PCIe | 5.0 | — |
| TDP | — | 130★ |
优缺点
MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5
- Strong platform (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average ai (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 12-core LGA2011
- Strong multi thread (69th percentile)
- Strong social proof (69th percentile)
- Strong ai (68th percentile)
- Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
价格
MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM50.064每美元得分
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 12-core LGA20110.262每美元得分
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 12-core LGA2011 性价比高 4.1 倍
结论
胜出: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
Scores 51 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 20 specs.
