fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud
fosa1
26 综合评分
vs
AMD Epyc 9355P
AMD
80 综合评分
评分
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Gaming
Budget
Efficiency
规格
| fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud | AMD Epyc 9355P | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | AMD |
| Series | — | EPYC |
| Model | X5650 | 9355P |
| Codename | — | Turin |
| Class | desktop | server |
| Process | — | 4★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 6 | 32★ |
| P-cores | — | 32★ |
| Threads | 12 | 64★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 32★ |
| L3 Cache | ||
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | 无数据 | |
| PassMark Single | 无数据 | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR3 | DDR5★ |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 3★ | — |
| Max Memory | 无数据 | |
| ECC | ✓ | ✓ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA1366 | SP5 |
| PCIe | — | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 无数据 | |
| TDP | 95★ | 280 |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 300★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
优缺点
fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud
- Strong platform (65th percentile)
- Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average multi thread (25th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (25th percentile)
- Below average ai (26th percentile)
AMD Epyc 9355P
- Strong ai (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong multi thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong platform (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong efficiency (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
价格
fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud1.374每美元得分
vs
AMD Epyc 9355P0.016每美元得分
fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud 性价比高 85.9 倍
结论
胜出: AMD Epyc 9355P
Scores 80 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 14 of 26 specs.
