Intel Core i5 2400 4-core LGA1155

Intel Core i5 2400 4-core LGA1155

Intel
35 综合评分
vs
DAKboard CPU v4

DAKboard CPU v4

DAKboard
16 综合评分

买家怎么说

Intel Core i5 2400 4-core LGA1155

62 满分 100 置信度低 7 条评价

大多数买家对翻新CPU的性能和性价比感到满意,尤其是价格方面。然而,一条经过验证的评论详细描述了与卖家的糟糕体验,包括损坏的贴纸、延迟发货以及扣除补货费后的部分退款,这大大拉低了整体情绪。

优点
  • 性能良好
  • 性价比高
  • 涡轮加速下运行良好
  • 不错的替代CPU
缺点
  • 价格可以更低
  • 卖家贴纸问题
  • 发货延迟
  • 部分退款和补货费
👍 Performance 4
👍 Value for money 3
👎 Vendor reliability 1
👎 Shipping speed 1
👎 Refund process 1
🤔 Product condition 2

DAKboard CPU v4

暂无用户反馈

评分

Budget
Intel
42
DAKboard
19
Productivity
Intel
38
DAKboard
16
Efficiency
Intel
35
DAKboard
13
Gaming
Intel
35
DAKboard
16
Ai Llm
Intel
31
DAKboard
11
Server
Intel
30
DAKboard
12

规格

Intel Core i5 2400DAKboard CPU v4
Processor
BrandIntel—
SeriesCore i5Cortex
Model2400—
CodenameSandy Bridge—
Classdesktopdesktop
Process32★—
Cores & Clocks
Cores44
Threads4★—
Base Clock
3,100
1,800
Boost Clock
3,400
无数据
Cache
L2 Cache1★—
L3 Cache6★—
Performance
PassMark Multi
3,856
无数据
PassMark Single
1,571
无数据
Memory
Memory TypeDDR3★—
Max Speed
1,333
无数据
Channels2★—
ECC✗—
Platform & Power
SocketLGA 1155BGA
TDP95★—
Unlocked✗—
Graphics & AI
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 2000—

优缺点

Intel Core i5 2400 4-core LGA1155

  • Strong social proof (71st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average multi thread (34th percentile)

DAKboard CPU v4

  • Below average efficiency (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average ai (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average multi thread (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile

价格

Intel Core i5 2400 4-core LGA1155 is US$50 cheaper (1.4x less).

Intel Core i5 2400 4-core LGA11550.288每美元得分
vs
DAKboard CPU v40.096每美元得分

Intel Core i5 2400 4-core LGA1155 性价比高 3.0 倍

Intel Core i5 2400 4-core LGA1155

DAKboard CPU v4

结论

★ 胜出: Intel Core i5 2400

Scores 35 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 22 specs.

Intel Core i5 2400 更擅长:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

也值得考虑