BenQ Ma320ug

BenQ Ma320ug

BenQ
79 Загальна оцінка
vs
ASUS XG32WCMS

ASUS XG32WCMS

ASUS
68 Загальна оцінка

Оцінки

Professional
BenQ
85
ASUS
60
Creative
BenQ
85
ASUS
60
Office
BenQ
79
ASUS
72
Gaming
BenQ
65
ASUS
76
Entertainment
BenQ
74
ASUS
68
Portable
BenQ
15
ASUS
11

Характеристики

BenQ Ma320ugASUS XG32WCMS
Display
Size31.5"31.5"
Resolution3840 x 21602560 x 1440
Panel TypeIPSVA
Aspect Ratio16:916:9
Curved
Curvature1,500
Performance
Refresh Rate120 Hz280 Hz
Response Time5 ms1 ms
Adaptive SyncFreeSync PremiumFreeSync Premium
Color & HDR
Brightness450 nits350 nits
Color Gamut98% DCI-P3, 99% sRGB95% DCI-P3
Color Depth10-bit
HDRHDR10DisplayHDR 400
HDR SupportHDR10HDR400
Connectivity
HDMI Ports11
DisplayPort1
USB-C41
ThunderboltThunderbolt 4
Speakers
Headphone Jack
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable
Tilt
Swivel
Pivot
VESA Mount100x100100x100
Features
Webcam
Touchscreen
PIP/PBP
Power29W50W
Weight8.50 kg9.39 kg

Плюси та мінуси

BenQ Ma320ug

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong color (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong display (90th percentile)90th %ile

ASUS XG32WCMS

  • Strong feature (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong performance (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong color (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average social proof (16th percentile)16th %ile

Ціни

ASUS XG32WCMS is 447 USD cheaper (2.2x less).

BenQ Ma320ug0.095балів за долар
vs
ASUS XG32WCMS0.177балів за долар

ASUS XG32WCMS пропонує у 1.9x краще співвідношення ціна-якість

Вердикт

Переможець: BenQ Ma320ug

Scores 79 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 30 specs.

BenQ Ma320ug Краще в:

OfficeCreativePortableProfessionalEntertainment

ASUS XG32WCMS Краще в:

Gaming

Також варто розглянути