JVC HAA4TB

JVC HAA4TB

JVC
56 Загальна оцінка
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
84 Загальна оцінка

Оцінки

Gaming
JVC
46
TOZO
80
Budget
JVC
63
TOZO
80
Travel
JVC
43
TOZO
78
Fitness
JVC
56
TOZO
72
Calls
JVC
36
TOZO
70
Commute
JVC
38
TOZO
70
Music
JVC
43
TOZO
68

Характеристики

JVC HAA4TBTOZO Crystal Pods
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesstrue wireless
Ear TipsMedium
Weight0.07 kg0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size12 mm10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.35.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life26 hrs7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery18 hrs35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantVoice assistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX4IPX5

Плюси та мінуси

JVC HAA4TB

  • Strong battery (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong build (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong connectivity (77th percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Ціни

TOZO Crystal Pods is 4 USD cheaper (1.2x less).

JVC HAA4TB2.801балів за долар
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods5.239балів за долар

TOZO Crystal Pods пропонує у 1.9x краще співвідношення ціна-якість

Вердикт

Переможець: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Краще в:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Також варто розглянути