Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Inland
51 Pontuação geral
vs
Kingston SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280
Kingston
98 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Laptop
Workstation
Gaming
Console
Budget
Portable
Especificações
| Inland TN320 | Kingston SSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 3 | 5★ |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | Sem dados | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | Sem dados | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | — | ✓★ |
| Controller | — | SM2508 |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | Sem dados | |
| Warranty (years) | 6★ | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | — | ✗ |
Prós e Contras
Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong endurance (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong affordability (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average capacity (18th percentile)18th %ile
Kingston SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong speed (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong endurance (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
Preços
Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.852pontos por dólar
vs
Kingston SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 22800.086pontos por dólar
Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 oferece 9.9x melhor custo-benefício
Veredito
Vencedor: Kingston SSD
Scores 98 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 17 specs.
