fanxiang 690Q

fanxiang 690Q

fanxiang
53 Pontuação geral
vs
Kingston KC3000

Kingston KC3000

Kingston
80 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Workstation
fanxiang
41
Kingston
82
Gaming
fanxiang
39
Kingston
78
Console
fanxiang
31
Kingston
76
Budget
fanxiang
52
Kingston
76
Laptop
fanxiang
55
Kingston
69
Portable
fanxiang
13
Kingston
20

Especificações

fanxiang 690QKingston KC3000
Drive
Capacity
500
1,000
Form FactorM.2M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 4.0PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation44
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
4,700
7,000
Sequential Write (MB/s)
1,700
6,000
Random Read (IOPS)Sem dados
900,000
Random Write (IOPS)Sem dados
1,000,000
Hardware
NANDQLCTLC★
DRAM Cache✗✓★
Controller—Phison E18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
160
800
MTBF (hours)Sem dados
1,800,000
Warranty (years)5★3
Features
Heatsink✗✓★
Hardware Encryption✓★—

Prós e Contras

fanxiang 690Q

  • Strong endurance (73rd percentile)
  • Below average capacity (26th percentile)
  • Below average feature (32nd percentile)

Kingston KC3000

  • Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong random (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong endurance (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong speed (80th percentile)80th %ile

Preços

fanxiang 690Q is US$ 172 cheaper (2.7x less).

fanxiang 690Q0.525pontos por dólar
vs
Kingston KC30000.295pontos por dólar

fanxiang 690Q oferece 1.8x melhor custo-benefício

Veredito

★ Vencedor: Kingston KC3000

Scores 80 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.

Kingston KC3000 Melhor em:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Considere também