ASUS ROG Strix XG259QNG-W 24" White 2024
ASUS
69 Pontuação geral
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025
Samsung
92 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Office
Creative
Gaming
Professional
Entertainment
Portable
Especificações
| ASUS ROG Strix XG259QNG-W 24" | Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 24.5" | 27" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS | QD-OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 380 Hz | 500 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 1 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium | FreeSync Premium Pro★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 400 nits★ | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 110% | 99% (CIE1976) |
| Color Depth | 8-bit | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 | HDR10+ |
| HDR Support | HDR400 | HDR10+★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 0 | 3★ |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✗ |
| Power | 22W★ | 140W |
| Weight | 5.90 kg★ | 6.90 kg |
Prós e Contras
ASUS ROG Strix XG259QNG-W 24" White 2024
- Strong performance (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong color (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong feature (72nd percentile)
- Below average portability (32nd percentile)
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025
- Strong performance (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
Preços
ASUS ROG Strix XG259QNG-W 24" White 20240.314pontos por dólar
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 20250.154pontos por dólar
ASUS ROG Strix XG259QNG-W 24" White 2024 oferece 2.0x melhor custo-benefício
Veredito
Vencedor: Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27"
Scores 92 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 28 specs.
