Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Pontuação geral
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z DX MC 20131 35mm
Nikon
39 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Portrait
Budget
Macro
Video Cinema
Street
Travel
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Especificações
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Nikon NIKKOR Z DX MC 20131 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | macro |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | — | 8 |
| Groups | — | 7 |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/1.7 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Nikon Z |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.22 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 52 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Automatic/manual |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 160 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.67x★ |
Prós e Contras
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z DX MC 20131 35mm
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong macro (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Preços
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064pontos por dólar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z DX MC 20131 35mm0.086pontos por dólar
Nikon NIKKOR Z DX MC 20131 35mm oferece 1.3x melhor custo-benefício
Veredito
Vencedor: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 44 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 0 of 18 specs.
