Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM 200-800mm
Canon
39 Pontuação geral
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Especificações
| Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM 200-800mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 200 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 800 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | — | 13 |
| Groups | — | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | — | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/9 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/6.3 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Nikon Z |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 3.17 kg | 0.45 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | USM★ | Stepping Motor |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:5.26★ |
Prós e Contras
Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM 200-800mm
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average build (0th percentile)0th %ile
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Preços
Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM 200-800mm0.018pontos por dólar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.090pontos por dólar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 oferece 5.0x melhor custo-benefício
Veredito
Vencedor: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.
