Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II

Sony
74 Pontuação geral
vs
Meike 19610004 28mm

Meike 19610004 28mm

Meike
48 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Travel
Sony
88
Meike
41
Landscape
Sony
75
Meike
35
Street
Sony
74
Meike
61
Budget
Sony
71
Meike
41
Wildlife Sports
Sony
67
Meike
35
Professional
Sony
66
Meike
46
Video Cinema
Sony
64
Meike
51
Portrait
Sony
58
Meike
62
Macro
Sony
60
Meike
49

Especificações

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS IIMeike 19610004 28mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm28 mm
Elements911
Groups85
Aspherical Elements4★—
ED Elements1★—
Coating—Multi-Layer Nano Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/5.6f/2.8
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/2.8
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountSony EMicro Four Thirds
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.11 kg0.10 kg★
Filter Thread41 mm49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusManual Focus
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm250 mm
Max Magnification0.215x★0.111x

Prós e Contras

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong optical (69th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)

Meike 19610004 28mm

  • Strong build (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Preços

Meike 19610004 28mm is US$ 283 cheaper (5.4x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II0.214pontos por dólar
vs
Meike 19610004 28mm0.745pontos por dólar

Meike 19610004 28mm oferece 3.5x melhor custo-benefício

Veredito

★ Vencedor: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II

Scores 74 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II Melhor em:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Meike 19610004 28mm Melhor em:

Portrait

Considere também