Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM

Canon
59 Pontuação geral
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Professional
Canon
62
Nikon
89
Macro
Canon
60
Nikon
88
Budget
Canon
69
Nikon
85
Street
Canon
57
Nikon
84
Portrait
Canon
44
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Canon
66
Nikon
82
Landscape
Canon
64
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Canon
61
Nikon
73
Travel
Canon
55
Nikon
70

Especificações

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USMNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max55 mm28 mm
Elements1913
Groups1211
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements23★
CoatingSuper SpectraMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountCanon EF-SNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.65 kg0.45 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSM★Stepping Motor
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops3 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance350 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification0.17x1:5.26★

Prós e Contras

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM

  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Preços

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM is US$ 171 cheaper (1.2x less).

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM0.067pontos por dólar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.086pontos por dólar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 oferece 1.3x melhor custo-benefício

Veredito

★ Vencedor: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Melhor em:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Considere também