TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
85 Pontuação geral
vs
EASC10SKT

EASC10SKT

Apple
36 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Budget
TOZO
79
Apple
38
Gaming
TOZO
79
Apple
38
Travel
TOZO
78
Apple
25
Fitness
TOZO
72
Apple
20
Calls
TOZO
70
Apple
42
Commute
TOZO
70
Apple
23
Music
TOZO
68
Apple
32

Especificações

TOZO Crystal PodsEASC10SKT
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear TipsMediumS, M, L
Weight0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm14.199999809265137 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOtherSiri, Gemini, Bixby
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5

Prós e Contras

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

EASC10SKT

  • Strong mic (70th percentile)
  • Below average comfort (28th percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)
  • Below average build (35th percentile)

Preços

EASC10SKT is US$ 7 cheaper (1.8x less).

TOZO Crystal Pods5.264pontos por dólar
vs
EASC10SKT4.027pontos por dólar

TOZO Crystal Pods oferece 1.3x melhor custo-benefício

Veredito

Vencedor: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Melhor em:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Considere também