FiiO FF3S
FiiO
26 Pontuação geral
vs
Samsung SM-R640NZWFXAR
Samsung
72 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Budget
Fitness
Gaming
Commute
Music
Travel
Calls
Especificações
| FiiO FF3S | Samsung SM-R640NZWFXAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | drum-style | true wireless |
| Weight | — | 0.06 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 11 mm★ |
| Drivers | 1 | 2★ |
| Impedance | 45 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 105 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | FiiO Drum-style dual cavity single dynamic driver earbud headphones, Black | Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro (2026) AI True Wireless Bluetooth Earbuds, White |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | Adaptive |
| Transparency | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✓★ |
| Multipoint | ✗ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 6 hrs★ |
| Charging | proprietary | — |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 26 hrs★ |
| Wireless Charging | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 3★ |
| NC Mic | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Siri, Google Assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✓★ |
| App | — | Samsung Wear |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IP57 |
Prós e Contras
FiiO FF3S
- Strong sound (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average connectivity (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average social proof (28th percentile)
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
- Below average anc (31st percentile)
Samsung SM-R640NZWFXAR
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong mic (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average battery (16th percentile)16th %ile
Preços
FiiO FF3S0.204pontos por dólar
vs
Samsung SM-R640NZWFXAR0.286pontos por dólar
Samsung SM-R640NZWFXAR oferece 1.4x melhor custo-benefício
Veredito
Vencedor: Samsung SM-R640NZWFXAR
Scores 72 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 12 of 28 specs.
