Dell QBT1250
Dell
59 Pontuação geral
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025
HP
96 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Gaming
Creator
Developer
Home Office
Business
Workstation
Ai Llm
Compact
Especificações
| Dell QBT1250 | HP OMEN GT16-0364 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | Intel Core Ultra 5 235★ | AMD Ryzen 7 8700F |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 14★ | 8 |
| Frequency | 3.4 GHz | 4.1 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB★ | 16 MB |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | — | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | Sem dados | |
| Type | integrated★ | discrete |
| VRAM | — | 12 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | — | GDDR7 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Generation | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB | 1 TB★ |
| Storage 1 Type | NVMe SSD★ | SSD |
| Build | ||
| Form Factor | mid-tower | mid-tower |
| PSU | — | 850W★ |
| Weight | — | 14.50 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | — | 2★ |
| USB Ports | — | 8★ |
| Thunderbolt | — | 0 |
| HDMI | — | 1 x HDMI |
| DisplayPort | — | 3 x DisplayPort |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6★ |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.3★ |
| Ethernet | Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet |
| System | ||
| OS | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Home |
Prós e Contras
Dell QBT1250
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong cpu (78th percentile)
- Strong ram (74th percentile)
- Strong reliability (70th percentile)
- Below average gpu (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average port selection (19th percentile)19th %ile
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile
Preços
Dell QBT12500.066pontos por dólar
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 20250.053pontos por dólar
Dell QBT1250 oferece 1.2x melhor custo-benefício
Veredito
Vencedor: HP OMEN GT16-0364
Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 10 of 26 specs.
