HamiltonBuhl Vivid Pro CAM17SV Red 2020
HamiltonBuhl
20 Pontuação geral
vs
DJI Osmo Pocket Osmo Pocket 3 Black
DJI
57 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Youtube
Vlogging
Streaming
Video
Beginner
Product Photography
Sports Wildlife
Wedding Events
Photography
Travel
Especificações
| HamiltonBuhl Vivid Pro CAM17SV | DJI Osmo Pocket Osmo Pocket 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | — | CMOS |
| Size | — | 1-inch |
| Megapixels | 18 MP★ | — |
| Autofocus | ||
| Subject Detection | — | ✓★ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 120 fps★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 1080p | 4K★ |
| 4K FPS | — | 120 fps★ |
| 10-bit | — | ✓★ |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | AVI | AAC |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 2.7"★ | 2" |
| Touchscreen | — | ✓★ |
| Articulating | — | ✓★ |
| Build | ||
| Weight | 0.27 kg | 0.18 kg★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✓★ |
| USB | — | USB-C★ |
Prós e Contras
HamiltonBuhl Vivid Pro CAM17SV Red 2020
- Strong stabilization (75th percentile)
- Below average build (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average sensor (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average video (23rd percentile)
DJI Osmo Pocket Osmo Pocket 3 Black
- Strong burst (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong video (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong display (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average build (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average sensor (29th percentile)
Preços
HamiltonBuhl Vivid Pro CAM17SV Red 20200.144pontos por dólar
vs
DJI Osmo Pocket Osmo Pocket 3 Black0.115pontos por dólar
HamiltonBuhl Vivid Pro CAM17SV Red 2020 oferece 1.3x melhor custo-benefício
Veredito
Vencedor: DJI Osmo Pocket Osmo Pocket 3
Scores 57 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 12 of 17 specs.
