TCL QLED 43P7K 43"
TCL
40 종합 점수
vs
Samsung Neo QLED QN70F 74.5"
Samsung
96 종합 점수
점수
Smart Home
Budget
Streaming
Corporate
Sports
Gaming
Movies
Outdoor
Portable
사양
| TCL QLED 43P7K 43" | Samsung Neo QLED QN70F 74.5" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 43" | 75" |
| Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Panel Type | QLED | Mini-LED★ |
| Backlight | QLED | Mini-LED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | — | ✗ |
| Picture Quality | ||
| Contrast Ratio | — | infinite |
| Color Gamut | — | Not Specified by Manufacturer |
| Motion Tech | 120Hz Game Accelerator | Motion Xcelerator 144Hz |
| Processor | AiPQ Processor | NQ4 AI Gen2 Processor |
| HDR | ||
| HDR Formats | HDR | HDR10+ |
| Dolby Vision | ✗ | ✗ |
| HDR10+ | ✗ | ✓★ |
| HLG | ✗ | ✗ |
| Gaming | ||
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| VRR | — | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| ALLM | — | ✓★ |
| Game Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Smart TV | ||
| Platform | Google TV | Tizen |
| Voice Assistant | Alexa | Amazon Alexa, Bixby |
| Screen Mirroring | — | SmartThings |
| Works With | — | Google Home, SmartThings |
| Audio | ||
| Speaker Config | — | 2.0 |
| Wattage | — | 20W★ |
| Dolby Atmos | ✓ | ✓ |
| Surround Sound | — | Dolby Atmos |
| eARC | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | — | 4★ |
| HDMI Version | — | 2.1★ |
| USB Ports | — | 2★ |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2★ |
| Ethernet | ✓ | ✓ |
| Optical Audio | — | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | — | 400x400 |
| Power & Size | ||
| Power | — | 183W★ |
| Energy Star | — | ✗ |
| Annual Energy | — | 344 kWh★ |
| Weight | — | 29.62 kg★ |
장단점
TCL QLED 43P7K 43"
- Strong gaming (66th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (21st percentile)
- Below average display (25th percentile)
Samsung Neo QLED QN70F 74.5"
- Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong smart (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong display (90th percentile)90th %ile
가격
TCL QLED 43P7K 43"0.124달러당 점수
vs
Samsung Neo QLED QN70F 74.5"0.107달러당 점수
TCL QLED 43P7K 43" 1.2배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Samsung Neo QLED QN70F 74.5"
Scores 96 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 14 of 39 specs.
