Apple iPad 11" A16 Yellow 2025

Apple iPad 11" A16 Yellow 2025

Apple
60 종합 점수
vs
Microsoft Surface Pro 12" EP2-33670 Platinum 2025

Microsoft Surface Pro 12" EP2-33670 Platinum 2025

Microsoft
69 종합 점수

점수

Student
Apple
53
Microsoft
77
Productivity
Apple
52
Microsoft
77
Reading
Apple
51
Microsoft
76
Art Design
Apple
62
Microsoft
68
Business
Apple
50
Microsoft
68
Entertainment
Apple
55
Microsoft
67

사양

Apple iPad 11" A16Microsoft Surface Pro 12" EP2-33670
Processor
CPUApple A16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100
CPU Multi-Core Score
9,830
데이터 없음
Cores58
GPUX1
GPU Benchmark Score59
Memory & Storage
RAM16 GB
RAM GenerationLPDDR5X
Storage128 GB256 GB
Storage TypeUFS
Expandable
Display
Size11"12"
Resolution2360 px2196 px
PanelIPSLCD
Refresh Rate90 Hz
Brightness400 nits
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
BluetoothBluetoothBluetooth 5.4
USB-C12
Cellular
Features
Stylus Support
Stylus ModelApple Pencil (USB-C)Surface Slim Pen
Fingerprint Reader
Face Unlock
Physical
Weight0.48 kg0.68 kg
Battery38 Wh
OSiPadOSWindows 11 Home

장단점

Apple iPad 11" A16 Yellow 2025

  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong screen (79th percentile)
  • Strong connectivity (70th percentile)
  • Below average ram (31st percentile)
  • Below average battery (31st percentile)

Microsoft Surface Pro 12" EP2-33670 Platinum 2025

  • Strong cpu (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong battery (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average gpu (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

가격

Apple iPad 11" A16 Yellow 2025 is US$501 cheaper (2.7x less).

Apple iPad 11" A16 Yellow 20250.199달러당 점수
vs
Microsoft Surface Pro 12" EP2-33670 Platinum 20250.086달러당 점수

Apple iPad 11" A16 Yellow 2025 2.3배 더 나은 가성비

Apple iPad 11" A16 Yellow 2025

결론

승자: Microsoft Surface Pro 12" EP2-33670

Scores 69 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 26 specs.

Microsoft Surface Pro 12" EP2-33670 더 나은 점:

ReadingStudentBusinessArt DesignProductivityEntertainment