Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Inland
52 종합 점수
vs
Seagate FireCuda 540 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Seagate
73 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Workstation
Laptop
Gaming
Console
Portable
사양
| Inland TN320 | Seagate FireCuda 540 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 3 | 5★ |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | 데이터 없음 | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 데이터 없음 | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | — | ✗ |
| Controller | — | E26 |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | ||
| Warranty (years) | 6★ | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | — | ✗ |
장단점
Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong endurance (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong affordability (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average capacity (17th percentile)17th %ile
Seagate FireCuda 540 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong endurance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong random (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong feature (72nd percentile)
- Below average social proof (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
가격
Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.858달러당 점수
vs
Seagate FireCuda 540 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.431달러당 점수
Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 2.0배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Seagate FireCuda 540
Scores 73 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 17 specs.
