SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
89 종합 점수
vs
Netac NV3000 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2

Netac NV3000 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2

Netac
49 종합 점수

점수

Console
SanDisk
86
Netac
25
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Netac
52
Gaming
SanDisk
84
Netac
51
Budget
SanDisk
57
Netac
67
Laptop
SanDisk
65
Netac
41
Portable
SanDisk
23
Netac
13

사양

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Netac NV3000
Drive
Capacity
8,000
1,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★3
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
3,100
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
1,400
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
데이터 없음
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
데이터 없음
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗—
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
300
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
데이터 없음
Warranty (years)5★—
Features
Heatsink✓✓
Hardware Encryption✓★—

장단점

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

Netac NV3000 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2

  • Strong feature (79th percentile)

가격

Netac NV3000 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 is US$1,903 cheaper (13.9x less).

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.044달러당 점수
vs
Netac NV3000 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.20.335달러당 점수

Netac NV3000 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 7.6배 더 나은 가성비

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Netac NV3000 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2

결론

★ 승자: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 더 나은 점:

GamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Netac NV3000 더 나은 점:

Budget

이것도 고려해보세요