Netac
Netac
58 종합 점수
vs
Kingston ValueRAM
Kingston
19 종합 점수
점수
Workstation
Gaming
Budget
Laptop
Server
사양
| Netac | Kingston ValueRAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4★ | DDR3 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | SODIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 200 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | 데이터 없음 | |
| CAS Latency | 16 | 5★ |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858★ | 1.7999999523162842 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 2.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓★ | ✗ |
장단점
Netac
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong feature (73rd percentile)
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
- Below average social proof (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
Kingston ValueRAM
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Below average latency (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average speed (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average capacity (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
가격
Netac0.810달러당 점수
vs
Kingston ValueRAM0.620달러당 점수
Netac 1.3배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Netac
Scores 58 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 7 of 14 specs.
