Kingston ValueRAM CL4
Kingston
16 종합 점수
vs
Netac
Netac
58 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Workstation
Gaming
Laptop
Server
사양
| Kingston ValueRAM | Netac | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | — | DDR4★ |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 1 | 2★ |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 240 | 288 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | 데이터 없음 | |
| CAS Latency | 4★ | 16 |
| Voltage | 1.7999999523162842 | 1.350000023841858★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | Intel XMP 2.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✗ | ✓★ |
장단점
Kingston ValueRAM CL4
- Strong affordability (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (71st percentile)
- Below average latency (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average speed (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average capacity (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
Netac
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong affordability (79th percentile)
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
- Below average social proof (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
가격
Kingston ValueRAM CL41.054달러당 점수
vs
Netac0.814달러당 점수
Kingston ValueRAM CL4 1.3배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Netac
Scores 58 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 7 of 14 specs.
