Timetec Pinnacle 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4-3200 CL22 SODIMM
Timetec
62 종합 점수
vs
ADATA Lancer Blade RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5-6000 CL30 Black
ADATA
86 종합 점수
점수
Gaming
Workstation
Budget
Laptop
Server
사양
| Timetec Pinnacle | ADATA Lancer Blade RGB | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Form Factor | SODIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2 | 2 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 260 | 288 |
| Rank | 2Rx8 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 22★ | 30 |
| Timings | 22-22-22-52 | 30-40-40 |
| Voltage | 1.2000000476837158★ | 1.350000023841858 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | Intel XMP 3.0, AMD EXPO |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Heat Spreader | ✗ | ✓★ |
장단점
Timetec Pinnacle 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4-3200 CL22 SODIMM
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average affordability (27th percentile)
ADATA Lancer Blade RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5-6000 CL30 Black
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong speed (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average affordability (16th percentile)16th %ile
가격
Timetec Pinnacle 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4-3200 CL22 SODIMM0.148달러당 점수
vs
ADATA Lancer Blade RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5-6000 CL30 Black0.115달러당 점수
Timetec Pinnacle 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4-3200 CL22 SODIMM 1.3배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: ADATA Lancer Blade RGB
Scores 86 overall, wins 4 of 5 usage categories and 4 of 16 specs.
