Crucial 8GB DDR3-1600 CL11 SODIMM (CT102464BF160B)
Crucial
33 종합 점수
vs
Netac Shadow III 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 White
Netac
59 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Workstation
Gaming
Laptop
Server
사양
| Crucial 8GB DDR3 SODIMM | Netac Shadow III | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR3 | DDR4★ |
| Form Factor | SODIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 1 | 2★ |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 204 | 288 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 11★ | 16 |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858 | 1.350000023841858 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | Intel XMP 2.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | — | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓ | ✓ |
장단점
Crucial 8GB DDR3-1600 CL11 SODIMM (CT102464BF160B)
- Strong affordability (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
Netac Shadow III 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 White
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong affordability (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
- Below average social proof (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
가격
Crucial 8GB DDR3-1600 CL11 SODIMM (CT102464BF160B)1.078달러당 점수
vs
Netac Shadow III 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 White0.835달러당 점수
Crucial 8GB DDR3-1600 CL11 SODIMM (CT102464BF160B) 1.3배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Netac Shadow III
Scores 59 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 5 of 14 specs.
