Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Phantom Black 256GB
Samsung
77 종합 점수
vs
Apple 256GB
Apple
84 종합 점수
점수
Flagship
Gaming
Photography
Budget
Foldable
Battery Life
Rugged
Business
Compact
사양
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 | Apple | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Screen Size | 7.6 | 6.9 |
| Display Type | Dynamic AMOLED★ | OLED |
| Resolution | 1812 x 2176 | 2868 x 1320 |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Brightness | 1200 nits | 1600 nits★ |
| HDR | ✓ | ✓ |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Apple A18 Pro |
| Processor Model | Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Apple A18 Pro |
| CPU Cores | — | 6★ |
| CPU Speed | — | 4.05★ |
| RAM | 12 GB★ | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0★ | — |
| Expandable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 50 MP★ | 48 MP |
| Camera Count | 3 | 3 |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 48 MP★ |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 12 MP★ |
| Front Camera | 10 MP | 12 MP★ |
| Optical Zoom | 3x | 5x★ |
| Video | 8K★ | 4K@120fps |
| OIS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery | 4,400 mAh | 4,685 mAh★ |
| Wired Charging | 25W | 30W★ |
| Wireless Charging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fast Charging | USB-C 25W | Fast-charge capable |
| Connector | USB-C | USB-C |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7★ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C |
| SIM | Nano SIM | eSIM |
| eSIM | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design & Build | ||
| Water Resistance | IPX8 | IP68★ |
| Form Factor | foldable | bar |
| Weight | — | 0.23 kg★ |
| Fingerprint | side-mounted | — |
| Face Recognition | ✓ | ✓ |
| OS | Android | iOS |
| Headphone Jack | ✗ | ✗ |
| Stereo Speakers | ✓ | ✓ |
장단점
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Phantom Black 256GB
- Strong feature (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong connectivity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong display (90th percentile)90th %ile
Apple 256GB
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong camera (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong display (90th percentile)90th %ile
가격
결론
승자: Apple
Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 12 of 42 specs.
