MIRO C1
MIRO
29 종합 점수
vs
Google Pixel 10a Fog 128GB
Google
90 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Battery Life
Foldable
Photography
Business
Gaming
Flagship
Rugged
Compact
사양
| MIRO C1 | Google Pixel 10a | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Screen Size | 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Display Type | IPS LCD | OLED★ |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 | 1080 x 2424 |
| Refresh Rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz★ |
| Brightness | — | 3000 nits★ |
| HDR | — | ✓★ |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | — | Google Tensor G3 |
| Processor Model | Mali-G57 | Google Tensor G4 |
| CPU Cores | 8★ | — |
| CPU Speed | 1.80 | 3.10★ |
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB★ |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Expandable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 50 MP★ | 48 MP |
| Camera Count | 2 | 2 |
| Ultrawide | 2 MP | 13 MP★ |
| Front Camera | 50 MP★ | 13 MP |
| Optical Zoom | — | 8x★ |
| Video | — | 4K@60fps★ |
| OIS | — | ✓★ |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired Charging | — | 30W★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Fast Charging | — | PD 3.0 |
| Connector | — | USB-C★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 6 |
| NFC | — | ✓★ |
| USB | — | USB-C 2.0★ |
| SIM | Nano SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| eSIM | — | ✓★ |
| Design & Build | ||
| Water Resistance | — | IP68★ |
| Form Factor | bar | bar |
| Weight | 0.19 kg | 0.18 kg★ |
| Fingerprint | — | in-display |
| Face Recognition | — | ✓★ |
| OS | Android | Android |
| Headphone Jack | — | ✗ |
| Stereo Speakers | — | ✓★ |
장단점
MIRO C1
- Strong battery (68th percentile)
- Below average build (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average performance (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average connectivity (27th percentile)
- Below average social proof (28th percentile)
Google Pixel 10a Fog 128GB
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong battery (89th percentile)89th %ile
가격
MIRO C10.285달러당 점수
vs
Google Pixel 10a Fog 128GB0.201달러당 점수
MIRO C1 1.4배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Google Pixel 10a
Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 22 of 40 specs.
