ASUS XG32WCMS
ASUS
68 종합 점수
vs
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026
MSI
96 종합 점수
점수
Office
Professional
Gaming
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
사양
| ASUS XG32WCMS | MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 31.5" | 27" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | VA | QD-OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✓ | ✗ |
| Curvature | 1,500 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 280 Hz★ | 240 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium | FreeSync Premium Pro★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 350 nits | 1000 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 95% DCI-P3 | 99% DCI-P3 |
| Color Depth | — | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 |
| HDR Support | HDR400 | HDR |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 1 | 1 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✓★ |
| Power | 50W★ | — |
| Weight | 9.39 kg | 8.00 kg★ |
장단점
ASUS XG32WCMS
- Strong feature (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong ergonomic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong performance (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong color (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average social proof (16th percentile)16th %ile
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong color (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
가격
결론
승자: MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27"
Scores 96 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 29 specs.
