Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm

Tamron
97 종합 점수
vs
Rokinon AF 135mm f/1.8 FE 135mm

Rokinon AF 135mm f/1.8 FE 135mm

Rokinon
48 종합 점수

점수

Video Cinema
Tamron
98
Rokinon
50
Budget
Tamron
96
Rokinon
47
Macro
Tamron
95
Rokinon
55
Professional
Tamron
92
Rokinon
58
Travel
Tamron
87
Rokinon
38
Portrait
Tamron
85
Rokinon
42
Landscape
Tamron
84
Rokinon
47
Street
Tamron
79
Rokinon
49
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
75
Rokinon
51

사양

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mmRokinon AF 135mm f/1.8 FE 135mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm135 mm
Focal Length Max70 mm135 mm
Elements1613
Groups1211
Aspherical Elements3★1
ED Elements23★
CoatingFluorine CoatingUltra multicoating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades911★
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.54 kg★0.77 kg
Filter Thread67 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeRXDLinear STM★
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★690 mm
Max Magnification1:4.81:4.2

장단점

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm

  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile

Rokinon AF 135mm f/1.8 FE 135mm

  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (33rd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

가격

Both products are similarly priced.

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm0.162달러당 점수
vs
Rokinon AF 135mm f/1.8 FE 135mm0.085달러당 점수

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm 1.9배 더 나은 가성비

결론

★ 승자: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm

Scores 97 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm 더 나은 점:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

이것도 고려해보세요