Canon EF-S 9517A002 17-85mm

Canon EF-S 9517A002 17-85mm

Canon
78 종합 점수
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 종합 점수

점수

Budget
Canon
86
Nikon
98
Wildlife Sports
Canon
69
Nikon
94
Travel
Canon
68
Nikon
92
Landscape
Canon
67
Nikon
88
Professional
Canon
67
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Canon
73
Nikon
82
Street
Canon
78
Nikon
81
Macro
Canon
78
Nikon
74
Portrait
Canon
72
Nikon
78

사양

Canon EF-S 9517A002 17-85mmNikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm200 mm
Elements1719
Groups1215
Aspherical Elements12★
ED Elements—1★
CoatingFluorine coatingARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/4
Min Aperture4-5.64-6.3
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
MountCanon EF-SNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.48 kg★0.57 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSM★stepping motor
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops3 stops5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance350 mm★500 mm
Max Magnification1:2★0.28x

장단점

Canon EF-S 9517A002 17-85mm

  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong optical (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

가격

Canon EF-S 9517A002 17-85mm is US$450 cheaper (2.6x less).

Canon EF-S 9517A002 17-85mm0.279달러당 점수
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR0.123달러당 점수

Canon EF-S 9517A002 17-85mm 2.3배 더 나은 가성비

결론

★ 승자: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 9517A002 17-85mm 더 나은 점:

Macro

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR 더 나은 점:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

이것도 고려해보세요