Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 종합 점수
vs
Rokinon Cine DSX14-RF 14mm
Rokinon
41 종합 점수
점수
Macro
Portrait
Budget
Landscape
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Travel
Wildlife Sports
사양
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Rokinon Cine DSX14-RF 14mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | wide-angle |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 14 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 14 mm |
| Elements | — | 14 |
| Groups | — | 10 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 2★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | — | Ultra Multi-Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | T22 |
| Min Aperture | — | T3.1 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Canon RF |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.75 kg★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 280 mm★ |
장단점
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Rokinon Cine DSX14-RF 14mm
- Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong macro (75th percentile)
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
가격
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064달러당 점수
vs
Rokinon Cine DSX14-RF 14mm0.104달러당 점수
Rokinon Cine DSX14-RF 14mm 1.6배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 44 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 1 of 17 specs.
