Tamron AFA035N700 100-400mm
Tamron
21 종합 점수
vs
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM
Canon
89 종합 점수
점수
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Professional
Travel
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Street
Portrait
사양
| Tamron AFA035N700 100-400mm | Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 100 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 400 mm | 70 mm |
| Elements | — | 15 |
| Groups | — | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 2★ |
| ED Elements | 3★ | 2 |
| Coating | eBAND coating | Super Spectra Coating (SSC) |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/45 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/4.5 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Canon RF |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 2.25 kg | 0.49 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | USD | STM★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 239 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:4.2★ |
장단점
Tamron AFA035N700 100-400mm
- Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average bokeh (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average aperture (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average build (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
가격
Tamron AFA035N700 100-400mm0.023달러당 점수
vs
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM0.081달러당 점수
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM 3.5배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM
Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
