Sigma Contemporary 887965 16-300mm
Sigma
49 종합 점수
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Sony
92 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Travel
Street
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Portrait
Landscape
Professional
Macro
사양
| Sigma Contemporary 887965 16-300mm | Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 135 mm |
| Elements | — | 16 |
| Groups | — | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-5.6 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Sony E |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weight | 0.62 kg | 0.33 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 55 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Linear motor★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 450 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.29x★ |
장단점
Sigma Contemporary 887965 16-300mm
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (76th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (74th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average build (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
가격
Sigma Contemporary 887965 16-300mm0.071달러당 점수
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.116달러당 점수
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 1.6배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Scores 92 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 19 specs.
