Zeiss Otus ML 35mm f/1.4 35mm

Zeiss Otus ML 35mm f/1.4 35mm

Zeiss
53 종합 점수
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony
83 종합 점수

점수

Street
Zeiss
49
Sony
82
Travel
Zeiss
26
Sony
81
Budget
Zeiss
44
Sony
80
Portrait
Zeiss
72
Sony
75
Wildlife Sports
Zeiss
33
Sony
70
Video Cinema
Zeiss
50
Sony
69
Landscape
Zeiss
34
Sony
68
Professional
Zeiss
51
Sony
63
Macro
Zeiss
58
Sony
58

사양

Zeiss Otus ML 35mm f/1.4 35mmSony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm50 mm
Elements159
Groups118
Aspherical Elements14
ED Elements01
CoatingZEISS T coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.4f/3.5
Min Aperturef/1.43.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades107
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
FormatFull-FrameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.74 kg0.12 kg
Filter Thread67 mm41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyPZ
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance300 mm249 mm
Max Magnification1:5.720.215x

장단점

Zeiss Otus ML 35mm f/1.4 35mm

  • Strong bokeh (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong optical (71th percentile)
  • Strong macro (67th percentile)
  • Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average build (31th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong aperture (77th percentile)
  • Below average macro (35th percentile)

가격

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm is US$2,001 cheaper (7.7x less).

Zeiss Otus ML 35mm f/1.4 35mm0.023달러당 점수
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm0.279달러당 점수

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm 12.1배 더 나은 가성비

Zeiss Otus ML 35mm f/1.4 35mm

결론

승자: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Scores 83 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm 더 나은 점:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

이것도 고려해보세요