Viltrox EVO AF 75mm F1.8 EVO 75mm
Viltrox
52 종합 점수
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Tamron
100 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Street
Video Cinema
Portrait
Travel
사양
| Viltrox EVO AF 75mm F1.8 EVO 75mm | Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 75 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 75 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 11 | 20 |
| Groups | 9 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | water and smudge-resistant coating | fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.8 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.33 kg★ | 0.59 kg |
| Filter Thread | 58 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM | VXD linear motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 740 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.12x | 1:3.8★ |
장단점
Viltrox EVO AF 75mm F1.8 EVO 75mm
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong build (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average macro (30th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
가격
Viltrox EVO AF 75mm F1.8 EVO 75mm0.159달러당 점수
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD0.418달러당 점수
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 2.6배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
