Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm
Sony
89 종합 점수
vs
Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF 200mm
Laowa
30 종합 점수
점수
Travel
Budget
Street
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Portrait
Professional
Macro
사양
| Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm | Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF 200mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 200 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 9 | 11 |
| Groups | 8 | 9 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | — |
| ED Elements | 1★ | — |
| Coating | — | 1034 |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-5.6 | f/2 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Canon EF |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.11 kg★ | 1.56 kg |
| Filter Thread | 41 mm | 105 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm★ | 1.50 m |
| Max Magnification | 0.215x★ | 0.15x |
장단점
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF 200mm
- Below average build (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
- Below average macro (29th percentile)
가격
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm0.255달러당 점수
vs
Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF 200mm0.017달러당 점수
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm 15.0배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm
Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.
