Panasonic MK-3.5mm F2.8 4mm
Panasonic
47 종합 점수
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Sony
82 종합 점수
점수
Street
Travel
Portrait
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Professional
Landscape
Macro
사양
| Panasonic MK-3.5mm F2.8 4mm | Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | fisheye | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 4 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 4 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | 10 | 9 |
| Groups | 7 | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | 16★ | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | 2.8 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Format | micro-four-thirds | APS-C★ |
| Weight | 0.19 kg | 0.12 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 61 mm | 41 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | PZ |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 95 mm★ | 249 mm |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.215x★ |
장단점
Panasonic MK-3.5mm F2.8 4mm
- Strong macro (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong build (83th percentile)83th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average optical (31th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average macro (35th percentile)
가격
Panasonic MK-3.5mm F2.8 4mm0.338달러당 점수
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm0.277달러당 점수
Panasonic MK-3.5mm F2.8 4mm 1.2배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Scores 82 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 20 specs.
