Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 종합 점수
vs
Sirui IronStar IRON-35-B 35mm

Sirui IronStar IRON-35-B 35mm

Sirui
39 종합 점수

점수

Professional
Sigma
98
Sirui
46
Portrait
Sigma
90
Sirui
48
Street
Sigma
88
Sirui
42
Budget
Sigma
85
Sirui
35
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Sirui
48
Macro
Sigma
83
Sirui
49
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Sirui
34
Landscape
Sigma
77
Sirui
33
Travel
Sigma
75
Sirui
22

사양

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmSirui IronStar IRON-35-B 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm35 mm
Elements1620
Groups1116
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements5
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8T16
Min Aperturef/2.8T1.9
Constant
Diaphragm Blades916
Build
MountSony EInterchangeable Mount with Included ARRI PL/Canon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg1.00 kg
Filter Thread72 mm92 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm650 mm
Max Magnification1:5.551:23.26

장단점

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Sirui IronStar IRON-35-B 35mm

  • Strong optical (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average build (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

가격

Both products are similarly priced.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm0.103달러당 점수
vs
Sirui IronStar IRON-35-B 35mm0.041달러당 점수

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm 2.5배 더 나은 가성비

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sirui IronStar IRON-35-B 35mm

결론

승자: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm 더 나은 점:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

이것도 고려해보세요