Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Sigma
91 종합 점수
vs
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm
Vivitar
37 종합 점수
점수
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Travel
사양
| Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm | Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | macro |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 55 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 55 mm |
| Elements | 16 | — |
| Groups | 11 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | — |
| ED Elements | 5★ | — |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | — |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | — |
| Constant | ✓★ | — |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | 55mm |
| Format | full-frame★ | — |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.45 kg | 0.14 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 55 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping AF Motor | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✗ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.55★ | — |
장단점
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm
- Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong aperture (67th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average social proof (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
가격
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm0.103달러당 점수
vs
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm2.609달러당 점수
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm 25.3배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
