Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Sigma
91 종합 점수
vs
Vazen T2 1.8x Anamorphic 65mm T2 1.8x Anamorphic 65mm
Vazen
34 종합 점수
점수
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Travel
사양
| Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm | Vazen T2 1.8x Anamorphic 65mm T2 1.8x Anamorphic 65mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 65 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 65 mm |
| Elements | 16 | — |
| Groups | 11 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | — |
| ED Elements | 5★ | — |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | T16 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | T2 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Micro Four Thirds |
| Format | full-frame★ | micro-four-thirds |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 1.68 kg |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping AF Motor | — |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm | 69 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.55★ | — |
장단점
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
Vazen T2 1.8x Anamorphic 65mm T2 1.8x Anamorphic 65mm
- Strong macro (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average build (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (30th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
가격
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm0.103달러당 점수
vs
Vazen T2 1.8x Anamorphic 65mm T2 1.8x Anamorphic 65mm0.011달러당 점수
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm 9.4배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.
