Leica Noctilux-M leicanoctilux50095sil 50mm
Leica
47 종합 점수
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
Tamron
97 종합 점수
점수
Video Cinema
Budget
Macro
Professional
Travel
Portrait
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
사양
| Leica Noctilux-M leicanoctilux50095sil 50mm | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 50 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 70 mm |
| Elements | 8 | 16 |
| Groups | 4 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 5★ | 2 |
| Coating | — | Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/0.95 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/0.95 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 10★ | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Leica M | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.70 kg | 0.54 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 60 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | RXD |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 700 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.0534722222 | 1:4.8★ |
장단점
Leica Noctilux-M leicanoctilux50095sil 50mm
- Strong aperture (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong bokeh (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong optical (66th percentile)
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average macro (29th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
가격
Leica Noctilux-M leicanoctilux50095sil 50mm0.003달러당 점수
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm0.162달러당 점수
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm 54.0배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
Scores 97 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
