Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox
74 종합 점수
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony
84 종합 점수

점수

Street
Viltrox
72
Sony
82
Travel
Viltrox
59
Sony
82
Portrait
Viltrox
69
Sony
80
Budget
Viltrox
68
Sony
80
Video Cinema
Viltrox
63
Sony
72
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
65
Sony
71
Landscape
Viltrox
50
Sony
68
Professional
Viltrox
53
Sony
64
Macro
Viltrox
62
Sony
58

사양

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mmSony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm50 mm
Elements119
Groups98
Aspherical Elements14
ED Elements11
Coatingnano multi-layer coating
Aperture
Max Aperture16f/3.5
Min Aperture1.73.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.17 kg0.12 kg
Filter Thread52 mm41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMPZ
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance330 mm249 mm
Max Magnification1:7.70.215x

장단점

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

  • Strong social proof (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average macro (35th percentile)

가격

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm is US$155 cheaper (2.1x less).

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm0.515달러당 점수
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm0.280달러당 점수

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm 1.8배 더 나은 가성비

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

결론

승자: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Scores 84 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm 더 나은 점:

Macro

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm 더 나은 점:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

이것도 고려해보세요