Hasselblad XCD Lens 38mm
Hasselblad
33 종합 점수
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Tamron
100 종합 점수
점수
Video Cinema
Professional
Budget
Travel
Macro
Portrait
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
사양
| Hasselblad XCD Lens 38mm | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 38 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 38 mm | 70 mm |
| Elements | 10 | 16 |
| Groups | 9 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 3 |
| ED Elements | 3★ | 2 |
| Coating | — | Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/32 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Hasselblad X | Fujifilm X |
| Format | medium-format | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 2.05 kg | 0.54 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | linear stepping motor★ | RXD |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 300 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:6.2 | 1:4.8 |
장단점
Hasselblad XCD Lens 38mm
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong optical (74th percentile)
- Strong macro (71st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average build (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
가격
Hasselblad XCD Lens 38mm0.009달러당 점수
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD0.170달러당 점수
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 18.9배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.
