Hasselblad XCD Lens 38mm
Hasselblad
33 종합 점수
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 종합 점수
점수
Portrait
Budget
Macro
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
사양
| Hasselblad XCD Lens 38mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | — |
| Focal Length Min | 38 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 38 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 10 | — |
| Groups | 9 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 3★ | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/32 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.5 | — |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Hasselblad X | — |
| Format | medium-format | — |
| Weight | 2.05 kg★ | — |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | linear stepping motor★ | — |
| Stabilization | ✗ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 300 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 1:6.2★ | — |
장단점
Hasselblad XCD Lens 38mm
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong optical (74th percentile)
- Strong macro (71st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average build (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
가격
Hasselblad XCD Lens 38mm0.009달러당 점수
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064달러당 점수
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS 7.1배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 44 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 1 of 18 specs.
