Thypoch Simera-C TP-SCCZ-MRF 135mm

Thypoch Simera-C TP-SCCZ-MRF 135mm

Thypoch
27 종합 점수
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony
84 종합 점수

점수

Street
Thypoch
17
Sony
82
Travel
Thypoch
20
Sony
82
Portrait
Thypoch
30
Sony
80
Budget
Thypoch
29
Sony
80
Video Cinema
Thypoch
22
Sony
72
Wildlife Sports
Thypoch
13
Sony
71
Landscape
Thypoch
15
Sony
68
Professional
Thypoch
15
Sony
64
Macro
Thypoch
21
Sony
58

사양

Thypoch Simera-C TP-SCCZ-MRF 135mmSony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min70 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max135 mm50 mm
Elements9
Groups8
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements1
Aperture
Max ApertureT22f/3.5
Min ApertureT2.93.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades167
Build
MountInterchangeable Mount with Included Leica M/Nikon ZSony E
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weight1.60 kg0.12 kg
Filter Thread77 mm41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyPZ
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance760 mm249 mm
Max Magnification0.215x

장단점

Thypoch Simera-C TP-SCCZ-MRF 135mm

  • Strong versatility (71th percentile)
  • Below average build (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average optical (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average aperture (26th percentile)

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average macro (35th percentile)

가격

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm is US$4,671 cheaper (16.7x less).

Thypoch Simera-C TP-SCCZ-MRF 135mm0.005달러당 점수
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm0.280달러당 점수

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm 56.0배 더 나은 가성비

Thypoch Simera-C TP-SCCZ-MRF 135mm

결론

승자: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Scores 84 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 20 specs.

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm 더 나은 점:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

이것도 고려해보세요