Viltrox Air AF 9mm f/2.8 9mm
Viltrox
60 종합 점수
vs
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
Tamron
68 종합 점수
점수
Travel
Macro
Budget
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Video Cinema
Portrait
사양
| Viltrox Air AF 9mm f/2.8 9mm | Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 9 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 9 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 5 | 17 |
| Groups | 4 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | advanced nano-coating | Internal Surface coatings, multiple-layered coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/9 | f/18 |
| Min Aperture | — | 3.5-6.3 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Nikon F |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weight | 0.13 kg★ | 0.40 kg |
| Filter Thread | 49 mm | 62 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Auto Focus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 14 mm★ | 450 mm |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:3.7★ |
장단점
Viltrox Air AF 9mm f/2.8 9mm
- Strong macro (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average optical (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
- Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average bokeh (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
- Below average aperture (34th percentile)
가격
Viltrox Air AF 9mm f/2.8 9mm0.376달러당 점수
vs
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm0.757달러당 점수
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm 2.0배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
Scores 68 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 20 specs.
