Sigma 49B969

Sigma 49B969

Sigma
60 종합 점수
vs
Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm

Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm

Insta360
35 종합 점수

점수

Portrait
Sigma
80
Insta360
65
Macro
Sigma
71
Insta360
16
Professional
Sigma
69
Insta360
40
Video Cinema
Sigma
61
Insta360
46
Street
Sigma
60
Insta360
45
Budget
Sigma
55
Insta360
36
Landscape
Sigma
52
Insta360
15
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
47
Insta360
32
Travel
Sigma
34
Insta360
17

사양

Sigma 49B969Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm
Optics
Typeprimefisheye
Focal Length Min20 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max20 mm35 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements2
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating, Nano Porous Coating (NPC)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2f/1.94
Min Aperturef/2f/1.94
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountL-MountInsta360 X4 Air
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight4.13 kg
Filter Thread62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance220 mm
Max Magnification1:6.67

장단점

Sigma 49B969

  • Strong bokeh (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong optical (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong macro (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average build (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm

  • Strong aperture (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average build (31st percentile)

가격

Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm is US$744 cheaper (30.8x less).

Sigma 49B9690.078달러당 점수
vs
Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm1.385달러당 점수

Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm 17.8배 더 나은 가성비

결론

승자: Sigma 49B969

Scores 60 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Sigma 49B969 더 나은 점:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

이것도 고려해보세요