FotoZ KZ-03 24mm
FotoZ
74 종합 점수
vs
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
Tamron
68 종합 점수
점수
Macro
Travel
Budget
Landscape
Street
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Professional
사양
| FotoZ KZ-03 24mm | Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 24 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | — | 17 |
| Groups | — | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | nano-coatings | Internal Surface coatings, multiple-layered coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | — | f/18 |
| Min Aperture | — | 3.5-6.3 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Nikon F |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weight | 0.12 kg★ | 0.40 kg |
| Filter Thread | 41 mm | 62 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Auto Focus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 16 mm★ | 498 mm |
| Max Magnification | 10X★ | 1:3.7 |
장단점
FotoZ KZ-03 24mm
- Strong macro (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong aperture (67th percentile)
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
- Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average bokeh (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
- Below average aperture (34th percentile)
가격
FotoZ KZ-03 24mm1.691달러당 점수
vs
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm0.760달러당 점수
FotoZ KZ-03 24mm 2.2배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: FotoZ KZ-03 24mm
Scores 74 overall, wins 3 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 20 specs.
